Kimberly Majeski
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Preacher Girl School
  • Media/Publications
  • Speaking
  • About
    • Store
    • References
  • Stripped Love
  • Preacher Girl School Member Only
  • Webinar
  • Link Page

Jesus' Wife Papyrus and What it Means for the Church

4/12/2014

3 Comments

 
Picture
So there has been a lot of talk this week about the now published report from Harvard regarding an ancient papyrus first revealed by Dr. Karen King in 2012. The fragment contains dialogue attributed to Jesus which reads, “Jesus said to them, ‘My wife…” and later “she will be my disciple.” Thus, the firestorm that began with the introduction of this fragment a few years ago has promptly been reinvigorated as scientists are now able to carbon date the ink of the papyrus as consistent with other similar fragments dating from 400 BCE to 700 CE. For scholars, this means that we move the papyrus from the late forgery column to consideration as an authentic ancient artifact.

Before all of Christendom is struck with cardiac arrest and turns to the streets with picket signs or pulls sponsorship of some organization or the other over evidence that Jesus may have been married and continued affirmation, in addition to the canon, that Jesus had female disciples; I’d like for us to take a collective breath and weigh out what all of this means. Seriously, breathe in, breathe out, take my hand and let’s talk through this.

On the canon...


First, we must admit that the evidence we rely upon most heavily for the details of Jesus’ life lie in the canonical gospels. If we understand the gospels as theological documents containing stories written about Jesus, at the earliest in the case of Mark, some thirty years after his death and Matthew and Luke closer to fifty years later while John’s gospel is the fourth and final dated somewhere around 90 CE, then we understand it is likely that there are some things Jesus said and did that we do not have recorded. In fact, the canonical gospels share nothing about Jesus’ life as a child, save the Temple story in Luke, and focus on his public ministry in the Galilee and the culmination of his life in Jerusalem at the crucifixion and resurrection.

For the canon to be authoritative for our lives, we need only affirm that we have what we need necessary unto salvation, that is to say, we are not forced to contend that within the canon we have all that was ever done or said regarding Jesus in the early centuries. If this is true, we need not be threatened by ancient evidence that emerges to tell us more about the earthly life of God incarnate.

On marriage…

The truth is, for Jesus to have been a thirty year old Jewish man living in the first century who was unmarried would have been a cultural anomaly. However, this would not be the only thing Jesus did that was culturally askew; he also ate with sinners, talked with prostitutes, touched dead people causing them to be raised, and he said, “Blessed are the poor.” Thus, the contextual argument alone is not  enough to conclude Jesus’ marital status.

It seems the bigger question is, what does it mean for Christendom if Jesus was married? What does it change about Jesus’ role in God’s salvific plan? Does Jesus’ marital status call into question the Catholic Church’s rationale for the celibate religious life? Perhaps but we don’t see issues of celibacy for priests addressed until the Council of Nicea in the 4th century which says a priest cannot be married after ordination. For Protestants, who allow clergy to marry, what are the concerns?

I wonder if the anxiety and outrage over the “Jesus’ Wife” papyrus says more about us than it does about Jesus.
It seems like this debate asks what’s true; what’s true about Jesus, sure, but also, what is true about Jesus’ 21st century followers. Are we afraid to admit, there might be things about Jesus that we don’t know? Are we uncomfortable with a wild and free God who might have stepped outside the boundaries of what we’ve come to accept? Do we wring our hands at the notion of new revelations and more to learn about Jesus, the man who walked the sands Palestine, whose sandals slapped the Roman road under the burning sun? Do we have room in our hearts, space in our minds to explore possibilities, to open to what God might want to show us in this millennia, are we willing to accept Jesus as he is, not as we want him to be?

While attending the Festival of Faith and Writing conference this week, I heard Rachel Held Evans say this to students at Calvin College in a chapel service. “I don’t think God wanted Scripture to be easy, otherwise we wouldn’t need to talk to God and we wouldn’t need to talk to each other.”

Maybe this is why new scholarship on ancient papypri helps us along. Maybe it’s good for us to scratch our heads, dig deep and consider new ways of understanding the life of Jesus. Maybe this reminds us we need to talk to God and we need to talk to each other.


3 Comments
David Neidert
4/13/2014 12:46:01 am

Excellent Kimberly. Thanks for your ongoing thoughtful reflection on matters of faith.

Reply
Dane
4/14/2014 01:27:04 am

I am continually amazed at what some consider "vital" for salvation. Your statement on authority is especially apt. We must always exercise caution in determining what actually matters. I don't see this doing anything other than disrupting some people's self-contrived image of Jesus. Oftentimes that sort of disruption is necessary for spiritual growth. On the other hand, the Jesus wife issue cannot responsibly rest on a single piece of textual evidence and what would be abberant in his society. I think your post does well to point out both that and also the bigger issue of what texts like this say about us.

Related tangentially to this is the recent outrage about the Noah movie. When we expect one thing and witness another it really brings out the zealots.

Reply
Georg Karl
4/24/2014 07:38:21 am

Well stated! A wedded savior would be an equally qualified atoning substitute for my sin, and exclusive Way to God and heaven.

The issue is the likelihood of it, even in light of this document. If Jesus were married, one would expect Paul to raise that point in the defense of his apostolic rights, for he referenced the wives of the other apostles' and of Jesus' brothers (1 Corinthians 9:5). I think Paul would have appealed to the greater authority of Jesus' example, rather than only his peers, were a wedded Jesus a possibility. That omission would be conspicuous, if Jesus were a married man.

Still, there is no statement in the New Testament that claims Jesus was single. So, which bears greater weight: the silence about his marriage or about his celibacy? In light of the conspicuous absence in the Pauline defense of his apostolic rights, I think the silence about his marriage sets the tone for historical information about Jesus. (Hard to argue from silence, isn't it?)

Carbon dating the "King" papyrus is necessary but doesn't the dating of the linguistics bear greater value for judging proximity to the primary witnesses? Are the language characteristics of the writing also typical of the 4th - 7th century? If so, 400 or more years after the Christ-event cannot bear much authority about historical events or figures if there is no corresponding assertion or conjecture (about the wedded Jesus) in a writing closer to the era of primary witnesses.

You wrote a great article. I am curious about it. Thanks.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Subscribe Today for Free Gift

    BLOG


    Picture

    Archives

    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    February 2018
    November 2017
    September 2017
    August 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    October 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    July 2010
    May 2010

    Categories

    All
    Advent
    Anderson University School Of Theology
    Anne Lamott
    Ann Voskamp
    Baptism
    Chick
    Church
    Church Of God
    Confessions
    Corinth
    Doubt
    Downton Abbey
    Egalatarian
    Fab Five
    Faith
    Final Things
    Found
    Graduation
    Grief
    Growing Up In Church
    Hagaar
    Hebrew
    Holiness
    Holy Land 2012
    Jesus
    Joanna
    Julie And Norberto Kurrle
    Kingdom
    Landmines
    Laughter
    Leaving Church
    Lent
    Living
    Loss
    Lost
    Love
    Lydia
    Marie Howe
    Mary
    Mary Magdalene
    New Life
    New Testament
    N.T. Wright
    Olympics
    One Holy Catholic Apostoic Church
    One Thousand Gifts
    Paul
    Peace
    Preaching
    Prisca
    Rachel Held Evans
    Real Housewives
    Reconciliation
    Revelation
    Sabbath
    Sarah
    Seasons
    Sex Workers And Soccer Moms
    Staying In Church
    Strippers
    Survivors
    Susanna
    Theology
    Watch And Pray
    Wesleyan
    Wisdom
    Woman At The Well
    Women
    Women Clergy
    Women In Geneaology Of Christ
    Women In Ministry
    Zumba

    RSS Feed

© 2020 Kimberly Majeski
Photo used under Creative Commons from garussell11
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Preacher Girl School
  • Media/Publications
  • Speaking
  • About
    • Store
    • References
  • Stripped Love
  • Preacher Girl School Member Only
  • Webinar
  • Link Page